- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I have called the State of Calif (EDD) several times and get several different answers to this question
Best Answer Click here
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Being exempt for withholding purposes is not the same as being exempt from income and SE-tax liabilities. The only exclusion that applies to ministers would be allowances designated as parsonage, which is limited by §107 to:
- the rental value of the home furnished as part of his compensation; or
- the rental allowance paid to him as part of his compensation, to the extent used by him to rent or provide a home and to the extent such allowance does not exceed the fair rental value of the home, including furnishings and appurtenances such as a garage, plus the cost of utilities.
The Code does not extend any preferential tax treatment to religious ministers per se but rationalizes this exclusion as being akin to §119.
CA does not conform to subsection (2) in limiting the exclusion to the fair rental value of the home pursuant to RTC §17131.6.
This exclusion also does not apply to SE-tax (unless exemption is granted by the IRS). In the absence of income tax withholding, the minister would also be required to make quarterly ES-tax payments or could otherwise be subject to underpayment of ES-tax penalty.
Still an AllStar
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
In regards to the parsonage allowance: our minister is paid a cash compensation of $76,700/year. He lives rent/utilities free in the church's residence. The value of the FMRV is $56,000 (including utilities). So do we subtract $56,000 from the $76,700 and he only pays taxes on $20,700 (W2 box 1) or is it just that he doesn't have to pay taxes on the non-compensation of $56,000, as a non-clergy person would have to and pays taxes on his cash compensation of $76,700 (W2 box 1). He has opted out of SS, SE.
In regards to the original question of the amount in box 16 of the W2 for State income - then the $76,700 is also put in box 16
thank you
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If he is provided cash compensation PLUS rent-free accommodation, why would you subtract FMV of the rental from $76,700?
"He has opted out of SS, SE."
He cannot "opt out" of self-employment tax. There are specific conditions that must be met, the exemption must be applied for, and it must be approved by the IRS.
In case you are not an accountant, you should consult a qualified tax accountant for implementation details.
Still an AllStar
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The reason I asked about subtracting the FMRV from the cash compensation of $76,700 is because our church was told by a lawyer that it should be done that way but after doing my own research it seems that the FMRV is an exclusion from income not a subtraction (as I was told by a tax consultant). In orders words the preacher doesn't pay taxes on the FMRV, only on his cash compensation
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Still an AllStar
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I do not think that the previous answers were entirely correct. This link is an excellent resource on this, especially for Californians.
https://www.dowoca.org/parish-resources/clergy-compensation/
This is my read on this work. The IRS generally treats clergy as employees for Federal Income Tax withholding, but not for social security and medicare. The Clergy is NEVER treated as an employee with regard to Medicare and Social Security - ALL CLERGY must process Medicare and Social Security by filing Schedule SE (Form 1040), Self-Employment Tax. Social Security cannot be withheld from a Clergy's paycheck. However, the Clergy ARE considered to be employees of the church if the church pays them a salary, AND the clergy submits a W4, AND if they meet the terms of the test for withholding listed in that link. Now, we come to California; if the clergy (clergy person?), submits a W4 for the IRS, he/she is ABSOLUTELY considered an employee by the State of California for withholding income tax. There is a lot of conflicting information on this, mostly coming from the EDD. However, it is clear that the State of California mirrors the Federal position on this. So, if they submit a W4, you must withhold Federal Income tax and State Income tax in California. If the Clergy at your church does not submit a W4, then you need to find a very good CPA about the needed steps to deal with their tax situation.