- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Its correct, thats how its always worked.
♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸♥Lisa♥¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It depends ... is the taxpayer Itemizing on Schedule A?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, they are itemizing so 90% is going on Sch A
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Then as Lisa said, yes, that is allowed and has always been the case.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you for taking the time to respond. It's much appreciated.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If they're hitting the SALT cap there's a wonky calculation that has to be made for the 8829. This year I had my first one of these that actually mattered.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Really? What is that? They are hitting the SALT cap. With so many of my clients being in high tax states, this is bound to happen again.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
See Form 8829 and the instructions.
Ex-AllStar
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
See the "Line 11 worksheet" on page 4:
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for your response. I had already taken this into account. I thought there was something else I may have been missing. Lisa is correct. It's been a long season.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Circling back to your original question/title . . . Unless the clients are just barely hitting the SALT cap then the property taxes should be down on the "excess" line 17 where they are not allowed to increase the Sch C loss.