Welcome back! Ask questions, get answers, and join our large community of tax professionals.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Part Year NY/GA resident?

workingtoolong
Level 2

Client moved out of NY/NYC in July 2020 to Atlanta,GA but still worked for the same NY company all year. While in GA she worked remotely. Employer took full NY/NYC taxes out. Isn't she a part year NY resident and part year GA resident and shouldn't she be taxed that way? Pro Series allocation worksheet does not allow me to allocate w

0 Cheers

This discussion has been locked. No new contributions can be made. You may start a new discussion here

3 Comments 3
Camp1040
Level 10

IT-203-B allocation of income by formula total days worked in NY / total days worked for the employer.  Works best if the employer has a presence in GA. This scenario assumes the client is a GA resident and not just getting away from NY temporarily.

0 Cheers
Terry53029
Level 14
Level 14

When you filled out the part year worksheet did you answer resident state same as source state for both states. That works fine for me         Resident state          source state

                                                             NY                              NY                $xxxxxxxx

                                                             GA                              GA                $xxxxxxxx

0 Cheers
itonewbie
Level 15

Unless your client telecommutes from GA for the convenience of the NY employer, compensation is sourced to NY based on NY statutes regardless of how the taxpayer's resident state may source that income.  This creates a potential exposure to double taxation as states typically look to their own sourcing rules for purposes of other state credit.  NY's position had been challenged in courts but prevailed.

As telecommuting became more common as a result of COVID-19, MA joined NY in instituting a similar tax policy to tax telecommuters who would otherwise physically work in MA.  MA argues that the new rules are meant to maintain the status quo but these have drawn the ire of NH which petitioned the US Supreme Court to hear the case.  CT (which implemented a reverse telecommuter tax recently) and NJ have since joined MA in the petition.  If the Supreme Court takes up the case, the outcome may affect NY's tax rules on telecommuters.

The exposure of telecommuters to double taxation is not new.  Bills were introduced in 2004 and 2016 by Congress to address these issues but these didn't get anywhere in the end.

It's one of those situations where a client could have talked to us in advance before the arrangement is materialized and we have no good news to deliver if we come to know about it only after the fact.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Still an AllStar