TaxGuyBill's Posts

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

TaxGuyBill's Posts

Have you confirmed that the Social Security is showing up on line 6a of the 1040 (and nothing in 6b)? Have you confirmed that the $80,000 is showing up on the 1040 (line 9 is over $80,000)?
Some salesman use that tactic to sell panels.  I think most tax preparers will just say "no".  In my opinion there are definitely circumstances that it can qualify as a business, but the "Net Meterin... See more...
Some salesman use that tactic to sell panels.  I think most tax preparers will just say "no".  In my opinion there are definitely circumstances that it can qualify as a business, but the "Net Metering" agreement significantly reduces that chance.  "Net Metering" means the taxpayer is personally using the energy, then sells any "extra" that they may have. *IF* they treat it as a business, then ALL of the electricity produced would be income (not just the 'net') and whenever the business becomes profitable it will be subject to SE tax.
@PATAX wrote: Yes I got that email but the fine print said that in order to get the $500 credit you had to agree to continue to use intuit until the year 2525.😉   Don't worry about that... See more...
@PATAX wrote: Yes I got that email but the fine print said that in order to get the $500 credit you had to agree to continue to use intuit until the year 2525.😉   Don't worry about that.  There is a "buyout" clause that lets you off the hook if you pay $600 for each year cancelled before 2525.
Have you looked at the definition in the Regulation?   (xiv) Meaning of trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of one or more employees o... See more...
Have you looked at the definition in the Regulation?   (xiv) Meaning of trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of one or more employees or owners. For purposes of section 199A(d)(2) and paragraph (b)(1)(xiii) of this section only, the term any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees or owners means any trade or business that consists of any of the following (or any combination thereof): (A) A trade or business in which a person receives fees, compensation, or other income for endorsing products or services; (B) A trade or business in which a person licenses or receives fees, compensation, or other income for the use of an individual's image, likeness, name, signature, voice, trademark, or any other symbols associated with the individual's identity; or (C) Receiving fees, compensation, or other income for appearing at an event or on radio, television, or another media format. (D) For purposes of paragraphs (b)(2)(xiv)(A) through (C) of this section, the term fees, compensation, or other income includes the receipt of a partnership interest and the corresponding distributive share of income, deduction, gain, or loss from the partnership, or the receipt of stock of an S corporation and the corresponding income, deduction, gain, or loss from the S corporation stock.   https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.199A-5#b_2_xiv  
Probably, yes.  Generally, I would enter an expense of a former business as a business expense (even though the business ended) or maybe as a deduction on Schedule 1.  However, this seems to be a... See more...
Probably, yes.  Generally, I would enter an expense of a former business as a business expense (even though the business ended) or maybe as a deduction on Schedule 1.  However, this seems to be a selling expense, so I think it may belong on 4797 or 8949 as loss. [Edited]
As dkh pointed out, if the client met the qualifications of being a dependent, he does not qualify for the credit.  It does not matter if the parents actually claimed him or not.
@oldsheldon wrote:   asset class      NR  lights up red    but no error message   NR is only possible answer   year of depec      2   this is filled in by proseries and  cross ref says it ... See more...
@oldsheldon wrote:   asset class      NR  lights up red    but no error message   NR is only possible answer   year of depec      2   this is filled in by proseries and  cross ref says it is for info only     It shouldn't be red and it should show Year 1, not Year 2, so something is acting up weirdly. Have you verified you entered 2023 for the placed in service date? Does it show any prior depreciation?  Or any 179 or Bonus? Does the actual Asset Entry Worksheet show the wrong depreciation, or is the depreciation correct on the Worksheet and carried to Schedule C/E/F incorrectly? Have you tried deleting the Asset Entry Worksheet and enter it again?
@HOPE2 wrote: Around January 2024 he contributed on Roth 401-K and Solo401-K under his name for the year of 2024. (same description: 2024 employee contribution) now I think he should cancel re... See more...
@HOPE2 wrote: Around January 2024 he contributed on Roth 401-K and Solo401-K under his name for the year of 2024. (same description: 2024 employee contribution) now I think he should cancel recent solo 401-K contribution under his name? Am I right?   and run 401-k through the payroll because he wants to have a employee for 2024.   Yes.  Any 401k contributions for 2024 need to be through the S-corporation and the employee portion is processed through payroll.
Hmmm.  That is weird.  Part 2 and 3 of the 8582 isn't showing the allowable loss?
@Carolyn Slaw wrote: Yes, they will do want is best for both.  I was going to allocate 100% to child and 0% to parent.  I think we can allocate column c any way we want.     You ca... See more...
@Carolyn Slaw wrote: Yes, they will do want is best for both.  I was going to allocate 100% to child and 0% to parent.  I think we can allocate column c any way we want.     You can only choose the allocation if all three of my questions are "yes".  Assuming that is the case ... In most cases it has the  best result to allocate 100% to the child. All three columns must be allocated the same way.
I'm not sure if they can un-do the SEP at this point.  But I'm not sure of the rules for removing a contribution that is NOT an excess contribution. For the future, your client may want to wait to ... See more...
I'm not sure if they can un-do the SEP at this point.  But I'm not sure of the rules for removing a contribution that is NOT an excess contribution. For the future, your client may want to wait to make any contributions until AFTER you prepare most of the tax return so she can get your input.
Was Advance credit paid (column C of the 1095-A)? Are both "covered" on the 1095-A? Are they agreeable to allocating to the best overall result?   I suspect you want to look at "Allocation Si... See more...
Was Advance credit paid (column C of the 1095-A)? Are both "covered" on the 1095-A? Are they agreeable to allocating to the best overall result?   I suspect you want to look at "Allocation Situation 4" in the Instructions for 8962.
@parvitstax wrote: I don't see anything saying it was not extended.  https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/energy-incentives-for-individuals-residential-property-updated-questions-and-answers   ... See more...
@parvitstax wrote: I don't see anything saying it was not extended.  https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/energy-incentives-for-individuals-residential-property-updated-questions-and-answers   Did you read that page in your link?  Where do you see anything that indicates that roofs still qualify?
https://accountants.intuit.com/community/proseries-tax-news-updates/discussion/investigating-schedule-a-changing-charitable-contributions-type/00/296281  
No, they still pay tax on the gain due to depreciation.  There is another rule if there was depreciation before May of 1997 though.  I'm not sure if that applies to your client or not, but the Home... See more...
No, they still pay tax on the gain due to depreciation.  There is another rule if there was depreciation before May of 1997 though.  I'm not sure if that applies to your client or not, but the Home Sale worksheet has a spot for it.  
@NkernCPA_SC wrote: No standard or actual expenses were taken as they were immaterial at that point.   Huh?  They didn't deduct fuel, insurance, repairs and maintenance?    Because ... See more...
@NkernCPA_SC wrote: No standard or actual expenses were taken as they were immaterial at that point.   Huh?  They didn't deduct fuel, insurance, repairs and maintenance?    Because they did not use the Standard Mileage Rate in the first year, they are not allowed to ever use the Standard Mileage Rate for that vehicle.
If she had the same answers for last year, it seems she should have had a credit larger than $1000. *IF* $5764 is the correct amount of qualified expenses and *IF* the scholarships are allowed to b... See more...
If she had the same answers for last year, it seems she should have had a credit larger than $1000. *IF* $5764 is the correct amount of qualified expenses and *IF* the scholarships are allowed to be used for non-tuition (such as a Pell Grant), I would go to the Student Info worksheet, go to Part V, and enter $6124 on line 4 (that is the amount of taxable scholarships plus $4000).  That will allocate $4000 to the American Opportunity Credit (assuming she otherwise qualifies).  Maybe there is a better way to do it, but that is how I make it work. In some cases it may be better to only allocate $2000 to the American Opportunity Credit (on line 4, enter the taxable scholarships plus $2000), but without knowing all of her information it is difficult to guess which is best.
Are you preparing a 1040 for a US Citizen or full-year US Resident?  If so ...   Yes, you report their Worldwide Income, including interest. Yes, you can file 1116 to claim the Foreign Tax Cred... See more...
Are you preparing a 1040 for a US Citizen or full-year US Resident?  If so ...   Yes, you report their Worldwide Income, including interest. Yes, you can file 1116 to claim the Foreign Tax Credit. Yes, FBAR needs to be filed.  AND FATCA (Form 8938).