Level 15
This widget could not be displayed.

I too think there's more to this story...

First, the city can't cut his pay by 10%.  Now, they can't because his salary is tied to retirement benefits.  But isn't everyone's retirement benefits tied to the salary somehow?  And what if he ends up not making the voluntary contributions, whether he agreed or not.  What proof does he need to produce?  What recourse does the city have if he doesn't?  If the city is contractually prohibited from cutting his pay by 10% or putting him on furlong, I just don't see how they could legally oblige him to do anything.

Still an AllStar